• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood

NYC Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Suit: Time Warner’s sports offerings inflate cable costs

June 24, 2013 //  by Jim Hood

It’s just the latest complaint against cable bundling

Complaining about the cost of cable is a popular American pastime. But four California consumers have decided to stop talking and do something about it, filing suit against Time Warner for anticipated costs due to the provider’s recent acquisition of Lakers and Dodgers rights.

The suit focuses on two separate acquisitions made by Time Warner. In 2011, the cable provider gained a 20-year-long right to broadcast Los Angeles Lakers basketball games. Then, in January, Time Warner acquired a 25-year-long right to air Los Angeles Dodgers games.

According to the suit, the Lakers deal, which cost Time Warner $3 billion, will add $4 to every customer’s monthly bill; the Dodgers deal, which ran $8 billion, will cost consumers $4 or $5 extra per month, the suit claims.

“There is no legitimate business, legal, technological, or economic reason why TWC cannot offer these Lakers and Dodgers games on a standalone channel basis so that only those subscribers who want and are willing to pay for them would do so and those who did not want these channels could ‘opt out,’” the complaint says.

The suit also names the Dodgers and the Lakers as defendants.

A popular complaint of late

This isn’t the first uproar over “bundling,” the practice of only offering content and channels as part of a larger group. (Bundling is the reason that you can’t, say, subscribe only to HBO and ESPN, while avoiding The Food Network and Lifetime.) In February, cable provider Cablevision , claiming that Viacom only offered popular networks like Nickelodeon and MTV if Cablevision also accepted a slew of less-demanded networks. Cablevision claimed that that practice, knowing as “tying,” violates antitrust laws.

And in May, Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) introduced the , which would allow consumers to choose the channels they wanted, and eschew the ones they didn’t.

(originally published at )

Category: blogTag: cable, cable bundling, Cablevision, John McCain, Time Warner, Viacom

Previous Post: « Supreme Court upholds American Express arbitration agreement
Next Post: “Happy Birthday to You” wrongfully copyrighted, suit charges »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Uber Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dilemma
  • What Does CAN-SPAM Require?
  • What Documents Should My Team Sign?
  • Using a Bad Contract Template
  • LLC vs. S-corp vs. C-corp

Tags

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) apple arbitration bank of america civil rights class action compliance corporate structure corporate taxation corporation criminal justice discrimination ea sports Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) employment employment law Facebook federal trade commission (FTC) Fourth Amendment Gawker gay rights Google hacking hurricane sandy injunction intellectual property law enforcement LLC national football league (NFL) New York City NYPD privacy racism same-sex marriage s corporation securities class action security breach settlement smartphones sports law stop-and-frisk terms of service Terms of Use U.S. Supreme Court
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Success Stories
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases. Please read our disclaimer. This Website contains general information only.
The information presented at this Website does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship.

The Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C.
43 W. 43rd Street, Suite 107, New York, NY 10036
Copyright © 2021 · Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C. · Web Design by: WarMarks