• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood

NYC Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Merchants challenge New York’s credit card surcharge law

May 31, 2013 //  by Jim Hood

A new front opens in the epic struggle over swipe fees

The battle over Comprar Calzoncillos Calvin Klein credit card swipe fees rages on, this time with a lawsuit filed today in U.S. District Court in Manhattan that challenges the constitutionality of a New York state law forbidding merchants from imposing a surcharge on any customer who pays with a credit card.

The plaintiffs — a hair salon, an ice-cream parlor, a liquor store, a martial-arts academy, and an outdoor furniture store — claim that New York’s law violates their constitutional right to free speech.

“The state is seeking to enforce the credit-card industry’s preferred speech code,” says Deepak Gupta, a Washington lawyer serving as lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Merchants should be able to use whatever words are most effective to inform their customers about the high cost of using credit cards.”

At least eight other states — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas,  Maine, Oklahoma, and Texas — have similar laws and Gupta said challenges to those laws are expected to follow today’s action.

Merchants pay a swipe fee each time a customer pays with a credit card. The cost of the fees are typically passed along to all consumers in the form of higher prices, the plaintiffs argue.

Call it what you will …

Merchants are allowed to charge different prices to consumers who pay with credit versus cash. But under laws in effect in New York and nine other states, the price difference must be described as a “discount” for cash, not a “surcharge” for credit — even though they are mathematically identical. In New York, a merchant who uses the wrong word could face criminal prosecution.

“A ‘surcharge’ and a ‘discount’ are just two ways of framing the same price information,” said Adam Levitin, a Georgetown law professor who has studied no-surcharge rules, in a news release issued by Gupta’s firm. “But consumers have a much stronger reaction to ‘surcharges,’ and are less likely to use credit cards if they understand that they will have to pay more. Credit card companies know this, which is why they insist that any price difference be labeled as a ‘discount.’”

The laws have taken on new life since February, when Visa and Mastercard, under a national class-action settlement, dropped contractual provisions prohibiting merchants from imposing surcharges. The battle is also playing out in statehouses across the country, with credit-card company lobbyists now urging more states to pass no-surcharge laws.

That settlement is in jeopardy, however, as 19 , signaling their intention to challenge the settlement in court.

Retailers say they pay the highest fees in the world to credit card companies and banks to swipe their cards because of unfair price-fixing within the industry.

Walmart, Costco, Starbucks and Gap are among the large retailers rejecting the settlement, saying it would not stop swipe fees from rising but would block them from challenging future increase.

(originally published at )

Category: blogTag: credit card surcharges, credit cards, New York

Previous Post: « Twitter settles suit with TweetAdder
Next Post: Judge dismisses eBay sellers’ class action »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Uber Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dilemma
  • What Does CAN-SPAM Require?
  • What Documents Should My Team Sign?
  • Using a Bad Contract Template
  • LLC vs. S-corp vs. C-corp

Tags

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) apple arbitration bank of america civil rights class action compliance corporate structure corporate taxation corporation criminal justice discrimination ea sports Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) employment employment law Facebook federal trade commission (FTC) Fourth Amendment Gawker gay rights Google hacking hurricane sandy injunction intellectual property law enforcement LLC national football league (NFL) New York City NYPD privacy racism same-sex marriage s corporation securities class action security breach settlement smartphones sports law stop-and-frisk terms of service Terms of Use U.S. Supreme Court
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Success Stories
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases. Please read our disclaimer. This Website contains general information only.
The information presented at this Website does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship.

The Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C.
43 W. 43rd Street, Suite 107, New York, NY 10036
Copyright © 2021 · Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C. · Web Design by: WarMarks