• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood

NYC Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

“Dr. Phil” producer sues Gawker Media

May 25, 2013 //  by Jim Hood

Deadspin gave away a show episode’s ending

One of the producers of the “Dr. Phil” TV show has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against online media company Gawker Media, basically claiming Gawker’s Deadspin blog acted as a spoiler.

Peteski Productions claims that Gawker’s sports blog Deadspin infringed Peteski’s copyright by airing parts of Dr. Phil’s interview with Ronaiah Tuiasosopo, the man at the center of the scandal that humiliated Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te’o earlier this year.

Peteski, based in Texas, filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint, filed on Tuesday, says that Deadspin hatched “a pre-meditated plan to steal Peteski’s copyrighted Cheap Converse Shoes material .”

Because Deadspin aired parts of the interview ahead of schedule, the suit alleges, the show attracted fewer viewers than it otherwise would have.

Interview came after Te’o “hoax”

The interview was explosive in and of itself. Tuiasosopo was the man who pretended to be Lennay Kekua, Te’o’s “girlfriend.” Kekua, who had supposedly died in September 2012, was often cited as a tragic part of Te’o’s personal background, and one that motivated him to throw all his effort into playing football.

Ironically, it was Deadspin that broke the news that Kekua didn’t actually exist, and was instead an elaborate “hoax” perpetuated by Tuiasosopo. The , published on January 16, 2013, was entitled “Manti Te’o’s Dead Girlfriend, The Most Heartbreaking And Inspirational Story Of The College Football Season, Is A Hoax.”

After Deadspin discovered that Kekua never existed, Te’o said that he had “developed an emotional relationship with a woman I met online.”

Gave away the ending

The interview with Tuiasosopo was aired in two sections — one on January 31, 2013, and the next on February 1. The January 31 show ended with a suggestion that Tuiasosopo might, on the following show, use the same voice that he used when he pretended to be Kekua. The cliffhanger was ruined, the suit alleges, by the fact that Deadspin had already posted the footage on its site.

“Although the second show was expected to exceed the ratings number of the first show, in fact, the ratings declined substantially because the result of the ‘cliffhanger’ was no longer in doubt. It had been misappropriated by Deadspin,” the complaint alleges.

“Gawker deliberately set out to get ‘the jump’ on the rest of the country and ‘scoop’ Dr. Phil with his own content. They did not earn that right, they stole it.”

Peteski is seeking an injunction preventing Gawker from using additional copyrighted material from the “Dr. Phil” show, as well as damages.

(originally published at )

Category: blogTag: copyright, Dr. Phil, Gawker, injunction

Previous Post: « License plate readers raise privacy concerns
Next Post: Ticketmaster settles “rewards” suit »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Uber Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dilemma
  • What Does CAN-SPAM Require?
  • What Documents Should My Team Sign?
  • Using a Bad Contract Template
  • LLC vs. S-corp vs. C-corp

Tags

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) apple arbitration bank of america civil rights class action compliance corporate structure corporate taxation corporation criminal justice discrimination ea sports Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) employment employment law Facebook federal trade commission (FTC) Fourth Amendment Gawker gay rights Google hacking hurricane sandy injunction intellectual property law enforcement LLC national football league (NFL) New York City NYPD privacy racism same-sex marriage s corporation securities class action security breach settlement smartphones sports law stop-and-frisk terms of service Terms of Use U.S. Supreme Court
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Success Stories
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases. Please read our disclaimer. This Website contains general information only.
The information presented at this Website does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship.

The Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C.
43 W. 43rd Street, Suite 107, New York, NY 10036
Copyright © 2021 · Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C. · Web Design by: WarMarks