• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood

NYC Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Prepare Contract
    • Review Contract
    • Prepare Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • LLC Formation
    • Corporation Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Apple, Amazon drop “App Store” suit

July 12, 2013 //  by Jim Hood

Both companies will continue to use the term

Yesterday was the fifth birthday of Apple’s App Store, the (in Apple’s words) “revolutionary” marketplace where consumers can buy apps ranging from Angry Birds to The Weather Channel.

And perhaps as a result of birthday cheer — or, more likely, a coincidence — Apple and Amazon have agreed to end their litigation over which company has the right to use the term “App Store.”

The issue, which was to be resolved at a trial slated for August 19, was voluntarily abandoned by both companies, with the blessing of Judge Phyllis Hamilton, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

“No longer see a need” for litigation

Representatives for both companies said the issue no longer seemed worth litigating.

“We no longer see a need to pursue our case,” Apple spokesperson Kristin Huguet . “With more than 900,000 apps and 50 billion downloads, customers know where they can purchase their favorite apps.”

And Amazon lawyer Martin Glick told Reuters that “[t]his was a decision by Apple to unilaterally abandon the case, and leave Amazon free to use ‘appstore.”’

The suit stemmed from Amazon’s March 2011 decision to name its marketplace the “Appstore for Android.”

“Amazon has begun improperly using Apple’s App Store mark in connection with Amazon’s mobile-software developer program,” Apple said in its complaint at the time.

Apple said that, before it filed suit, it asked Amazon three times to change the name of its marketplace, but never received a “substantive response.”

Confusion, generic name were issues

While Amazon and Apple are both surely glad to avoid a trial (Apple CEO Tim Cook famously said last year that “I’ve always hated litigation, and I continue to hate it”), hardcore techies and legal junkies may be disappointed by the fact that Cheap Converse Shoes there won’t be a trial.

Already, the case had presented several interesting twists, including a June 2011 observation by the judge that Apple hadn’t shown sufficient “real evidence of actual confusion” between the two app stores.

And Amazon had made the argument that “App Store” was too generic a term to be subject to a valid trademark.

(originally published at )

Category: blogTag: amazon, app store, apple, intellectual property

Previous Post: « Former cheerleader waits on defamation verdict
Next Post: NFL concussion suit goes to mediation »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Uber Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dilemma
  • What Does CAN-SPAM Require?
  • What Documents Should My Team Sign?
  • Using a Bad Contract Template
  • LLC vs. S-corp vs. C-corp

Tags

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) apple arbitration bank of america civil rights class action compliance corporate structure corporate taxation corporation criminal justice discrimination ea sports Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) employment employment law Facebook federal trade commission (FTC) Fourth Amendment Gawker gay rights Google hacking hurricane sandy injunction intellectual property law enforcement LLC national football league (NFL) New York City NYPD privacy racism same-sex marriage s corporation securities class action security breach settlement smartphones sports law stop-and-frisk terms of service Terms of Use U.S. Supreme Court
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Success Stories
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases. Please read our disclaimer. This Website contains general information only.
The information presented at this Website does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship.

The Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C.
43 W. 43rd Street, Suite 107, New York, NY 10036
Copyright © 2021 · Law Offices of Jonathan L. Hood, P.C. · Web Design by: WarMarks