• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Hood Venture Counsel, P.C.

NYC Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Contract Preparation/Review
    • Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • Entity Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Compliance
    • Not-for-Profits
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Jonathan L. Hood, Esq.
    • Benton J. Levy, Esq.
  • Services
    • Contract Preparation/Review
    • Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
    • Entity Formation
    • Trademark Application
    • Copyright Application
    • Compliance
    • Not-for-Profits
    • Investment
    • Concierge General Counsel
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Appeals Court Halts Anti-Stop-and-Frisk Ruling

November 1, 2013 //  by Jim Hood

In a wrenching setback for opponents of the New York City Police Department’s stop-and-frisk Parajumpers Jacka Billigt policy, a federal appellate court has a trial judge’s order that the NYPD make widespread changes to that program and has removed her from the case, claiming that Cheap Burberry Cashmere Scarf she failed to maintain the appearance of impartiality required of a judge.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said that Judge Schira Scheindlin, who that stop-and-frisk violates the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures, “ran afoul of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.” In particular, the Second Circuit took issue with Scheindlin making public statements about the case and also with a comment she made to plaintiffs in an earlier stop-and-frisk case that “if you got proof of inappropriate racial profiling in a good constitutional case, why don’t you bring a lawsuit?”

The ruling is a victory for the Bloomberg Administration, which has expanded the stop-and-frisk program during its time in office. On the other hand, the city will elect a new mayor in less than a week, and Democrat Bill de Blasio, who , has been an outspoken critic of the current stop-and-frisk program. Opponents of the policy now to the man they hope and expect will be the city’s next mayor to rein in stop-and-frisk once and for all.

Category: blogTag: civil rights, discrimination, law enforcement, New York City, NYPD, stop-and-frisk

Previous Post: « Securities Class Action Another Blow to BlackBerry
Next Post: Court Declines to Vacate Original Stop-and-Frisk Ruling »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • How Hiring Outside Legal Counsel Benefits Your Tech Start Up
  • Here’s What Makes a Good NDA
  • Starting a Cannabis Business? Don’t Proceed Further Without Doing This First
  • The Mistake That Can Tank Your Business
  • The Uber Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dilemma

Tags

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) apple arbitration bank of america civil rights class action compliance corporate structure corporate taxation corporation criminal justice discrimination ea sports Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) employment employment law Facebook federal trade commission (FTC) Fourth Amendment Gawker gay rights Google hacking hurricane sandy injunction intellectual property law enforcement LLC national football league (NFL) New York City NYPD privacy racism same-sex marriage s corporation securities class action security breach settlement smartphones sports law stop-and-frisk terms of service Terms of Use U.S. Supreme Court
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Success Stories
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Site Footer

Hood Venture Counsel, P.C.

43 W. 43rd Street, Suite 107, New York, NY 10036

Copyright © 2021 · Hood Venture Counsel, P.C. · Web Design by: WarMarks